Dolphin Times: Issue 2


This issue will explain to you the differences of dolphins in captivity and in the wild, as well as connections of dolphin captivity and slavery. At the end, there will be an update on the latest dolphin news.  If you have any concerns, suggestions for the next issue or private comments, please email me at dolphindefender@me.com.

DIFFERENCES OF DOLPHINS IN THE WILD AND CAPTIVITY 

Dolphins in the wild:

  • Have large home ranges (e.g. orcas can dive as deep as 60m and travel as far as 160km in a day and bottlenose dolphins off the coast of Cornwall, UK, have been recorded travelling up to 1076km in 20 days.Are almost always in motion, even when resting and spend less than 20% of their time at the water’s surface.
  • Orcas and Dall’s porpoise are two of the fastest animals in the sea (Dall’s porpoises can reach swimming speeds of up to 35mph).
  • Live in highly complex societies; with some individuals holding key roles within a specific group (e.g. communicator with other pods, nursing).
  • Choose to form strong, long-lasting social bonds with certain other members of their pod.
  • Are intelligent and can demonstrate problem solving and abstract concept formation, e.g.. utilise tools – female bottlenose dolphins in Australia have learned to use natural sponges to protect their beaks while foraging among sea urchins on the sea bed.
  • Are altruistic, some species have been witnessed helping other members of their pod, other species and even humans in trouble. They are self-aware and display highly responsive behavior.
  • Have culture i.e. they teach and learn traditions (e.g. Patagonian orcas partially strand themselves to catch sea-lions).
  • Demonstrate a high degree of vocal adaptability e.g. orcas in different parts of the world
  • have completely different dialects from one another.
  • Live up to 90 years (female orcas) and 60 years (male orcas), and average life span is 40-50 years.

Dolphins in captivity:

  • Are separated from their natural habitat and enclosed in a totally alien environment.
  • Have to undergo medication and fertility control.
  • Aquatic Mammals 2005, 31 (3) lists 199 facilities worldwide. More have established since then.
  • Have to put up with an artificial diet, unusual noise, strange tastes in water, and the proximity of people and other unfamiliar captive animals.
  • No longer have free will to choose social bonds.
  • May suffer aggression from other pool mates more dominant than them.
  • Are sometimes kept on their own (some in hotel swimming pools), e.g. four orcas are currently held in captivity on their own.
  • Suffer from stress, reduced life expectancy and breeding problems.
  • The Marine Mammal Inventory Report, maintained by the U.S. government, lists a variety of causes of death including drowning, ingestion of foreign objects and aggression from pool mates
  • Don’t live past the age of 50 and average life span is 30 years.

To demonstrate these differences, please watch the following 6 minute video that I made about this (warning…first two minutes is sad):

DOLPHIN CAPTIVITY/SLAUGHTER, SLAVERY, AND THE HOLOCAUST: THE SIMILARITIES ARE SHOCKING

For marine parks like SeaWorld and Miami Seaquarium, they obviously need to have dolphins (including Orcas and Pilot Whales). How do they get these dolphins? They go out, take them away from their families, and enslave them in an unrealistic concrete (or other man-made material) barrier. They then work those dolphins to perform for us until they die. Then, they go and get new ones. In Taiji (aka…Hell on Earth), dolphins are selected by trainers (playing the part of Hitler), particularly young female bottlenose dolphins. The ones that aren’t selected are brutally, barbarically, and mercilessly slaughtered.

How does this relate to slavery? I think the reasons are pretty obvious…We are taking intelligent beings (more intelligent than us…for more click here and here), treating them as property and buying them for money to…make money? When slavery was still going on in the U.S, wasn’t that what was happening? Our country took African Americans away from their home, and bought them to make more money off of cotton, tobacco, and other crops. After a while, half the country believed that was wrong, and eventually it was banished…or so we thought. True, dolphins aren’t degraded to working on a farm all day to make money, but they’re degraded as circus clowns all day to make money. If we think that 18-19th century slavery is wrong, then why is enslaving animals more intelligent than us right?  As we’ve all recently heard, PETA has sued SeaWorld for violating the Thirteenth Amendment, which states, ” Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.” The term slave is defined as “An individual who is the legal property of another and is forced to obey them against their will.” Let’s see, there’s nothing in either of those two terms that says this applies only to man, and even if it did, that should be changed. Are dolphins “legal property” and are they “forced to obey their owners?” Hmm…sounds like it.

In the Holocaust, Hitler posted propaganda that Hebrews were why there was problems in the world, when in reality, it was them and others like him that were causing the problems. In Taiji, the fisherman say that they’re slaughtering dolphins “for pest control.” According to them (and what they said in The Cove), dolphins are the reason that fish levels are dropping; but in reality, humans (and mostly Asia) are the reason that fish levels are declining. Furthermore, in the Holocaust, Hitler wanted to “make the world perfect.” He did this by taking the Hebrews that “did not fit his conditions,” meaning that if their eyes aren’t blue, their hair isn’t blond, they weren’t in shape, or if they had a disease, to concentration camps. In Taiji, we can look at this in two different, but connected, directions. For example, dolphins that aren’t selected by the trainers that come to capture them (they have even been seen assisting in the drive) are slaughtered viciously. The reasons they are not selected is because trainers do not see them “fit for entertainment.” Hebrews that Hitler found unfit were slaughtered in various ways as well.  In contrast,  those trainers that come and do capture dolphins and take them back to their marine parks are doing the exact opposite.

Now, I know what some of you may be thinking, That’s good isn’t it? Or more commonly, but then they’re saving the dolphins, right?  The answer to both of those questions is no.  The only reason those dolphins usually cooperate in captivity is, WHAT ELSE ARE THEY GOING TO DO? That is their only form, and I find it to be a fake form, of fun. Like many things, fun is not something that people can make. Fun is something that, and I know this sounds cliche, but it’s felt from the heart. People ask me at school, “What’s the difference between a dolphin jumping at SeaWorld and a dolphin jumping in the wild? There is none, right?” Well, if you look at the videos below, you can see that the jump performed by the Orca at SeaWorld is perfect. A perfect flight, perfect arc, perfect height, perfect splash, and a perfect dive. In the wild, it’s not perfect. Why? Because it doesn’t have to be; they don’t care in the wild whether the jump is perfect or not. So, who’s the luckier dolphin? Would you rather spend your whole life doing stupid tricks that have no purpose whatsoever or die? The one that’s imprisoned for life, or the one that’s slaughtered? Honestly, however painful that death may be, I would rather die free than die a slave.

Jump in Captivity: Watch how everything is perfect in the jumps.

Jump in the Wild: Watch how everything is more relaxed and careless in the jumps

COMMON CAPTIVITY QUESTIONS:

Aren’t dolphins in captivity educational?
The primary justification for the public display of marine mammals is the educational benefit of these exhibits. Whale and dolphin displays significantly distort the public’s understanding of the marine environment. Educational messages often take second place to the whale and dolphin performance, which are the main feature of dolphinariums. The tricks that are displayed are exaggerated variations of natural behaviors and do little to further the public’s knowledge of cetaceans and their habitats. In addition, the complex nature of the lives of whales and dolphins cannot possibly be illustrated with reference to animals in a tank. Educational materials offered by captive facilities often blatantly omit facts about a species’ unique social structure and acoustic repertoire, as well as its remarkable extended families and natural tendency to range freely over vast areas. Visitors to captive facilities may be subject to mis-information, and leave with a distorted perception of cetaceans and their marine environments.

Isn’t captivity safer than life in the wild?
Whales and dolphins have evolved over millions of years to live in the ocean; it is their natural habitat. The way to solve hunting, pollution and other threats is to tackle the point sources of these problems, not to take these animals out of the seas.

The idea that dolphins (or any wildlife) must be saved from the threats and challenges they face in the wild by being placed in artificial settings is a terrible conservation message. The fact is that while life IS tough for these animals in the open ocean, it is also complex, challenging, engrossing, and beautiful. It is never going to be a solution to the growing number of threats dolphins face to try to preserve them in the ‘ark’ of dolphinariums (and no legitimate zoological facilities promote the ‘ark’ theory for zoos and aquariums anymore either). If people think that captivity IS a solution to habitat threats the focus is then taken away from reducing the threats to wild dolphins. This potentially means that wild dolphins don’t stand a chance of long-term survival! If people believe that it’s better for dolphins to be in a cage rather than in the wide open ocean, this only emphasizes how dolphinariums miseducate the public.

Captive-born dolphins are happy in captivity, aren’t they?
Another argument suggests that dolphins born in captivity are domesticated. However, dolphins are STILL wild animals, even if they have been kept in captivity for some time, even if they were born there.

Animals born in captivity are domesticated, so they’re not wild anymore?
Domestication is the modification of an animal over a significant number of generations through selective breeding in captivity. Certain characteristics are either enhanced or eliminated and the animals become adapted to a significant extent to a life intimately associated with man (i.e. dogs).

Whales and dolphins are wild animals. In captivity they may develop strong social bonds with their human trainers however this is correctly known as being socialized or habituated, not domesticated. Domestication happens over a very long period of evolutionary time, while an individual is habituated during its lifetime. Breeding in dolphinariums is rare, let alone breeding that occurs between individuals with the most docile personalities or smallest number or size of teeth. Dolphins are tamed, they are not domesticated.

Wouldn’t dolphins in “open” sea pens escape if they were not happy?
This can be addressed on two different levels: Dolphins that have been taken from the wild have been removed from their social group and natural habitat. Finding themselves in an alien environment far from their natural home, these animals may fear venturing out into an unknown sea, away from the facility that provides them with food. Young animals are often selected who may not have learnt all the skills needed to survive in the wild. The captives are also habituated to human company – this does not mean to say that they are happy.

It is also important to remember that these individual dolphins have been conditioned. If you have been to a show- have you ever noticed that the performing animals are fed fish each time they complete a routine or a trick? They may be performing so that they receive fish or other rewards.

 Dolphin’s smile, so they must be happy…
Dolphins have a natural smile. They are born this way (i.e. it’s physiological). Similarly, they do not frown when upset, distressed or angry. Marine biologists study the behaviour of dolphins, using an ethogram (a known repertoire of behaviours used for particular purposes e.g. tail slapping is known to be a warning). It is by studying the behaviour of an animal that we can begin to tell how it may be feeling. Dolphins or whales that swim listlessly around their tanks, using the same route are showing stereotypical behaviour. This is similar to when you see polar bears or elephants rocking back and forth in a zoo. These animals may be suffering a great deal of mental distress. In fact, many dolphins have to take a form of stress medication, Tagumet, because of these conditions.

Aren’t whales and dolphins happy if they do tricks and eat fish?
People always think that if the dolphins were unhappy they would not ‘work’ or would refuse to eat. It is true that some dolphins survive better than others, much like humans do in difficult circumstances. Some dolphins will just get on with their training and shows – and as I said before, what else is there for them to do in these boring bare tanks?

for more questions, please visit my FAQ page.

===========================================================
DOLPHIN NEWS UPDATES:

This week in Taiji, so far the 30th of October and the 3rd of November are the only days that the dolphin murderers have slaughtered dolphins. The other 4 days, the dolphins either escapes, were nowhere to be found, or the boats could not go out at all. For more updates from Taiji, please visit here.

The deaths of five more dolphins in the Gulf of Mexico was found out to be caused by a bacteria called Brucella, according to CNN. One scientist, Teri Rowles, states that they may be infected due to “environmental stress” which could possibly be related to the BP oil spill. The other explanation that the scientists believe is that the bacteria itself has changed, causing disease. For more on this, click here.

Presidential commission seeks 'to give voice to the region'

An independent commission formed by President Barack Obama to look at the root causes of the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster and the proper process for combating such catastrophes in the future holds its first public hearing Monday in New Orleans.

The hearing at the Hilton Riverside downtown begins at 9 a.m. More information is available at the commission’s website, http://www.oilspillcommission.gov.

President Barack Obama was photographed June 1 with the leaders of the BP Oil Spill Commission: former Florida Sen. Bob Graham, left, and former EPA Administrator William Reilly.

The seven-member commission is led by former Democratic Sen. Bob Graham and Republican former Environmental Protection Agency Director William Reilly, who said in a joint interview Friday that they want to determine why advances in safety, cleanup and government oversight haven’t kept pace with the technology that allowed oil companies to drill deeper and farther offshore.

Graham said Monday’s hearing will mainly be a status report from Coast Guard and BP representatives about the progress and challenges of the cleanup and containment efforts that have dragged on for nearly three months.

The second meeting Tuesday will focus on fishers, oil industry workers, hotel operators and others in coastal communities hurt by the spill and the resulting forced stoppage of deepwater drilling.

This image from video provided by BP PLC late Friday, July 9, 2010 shows oil continuing to leak from the broken wellhead, at the site of the Deepwater Horizon oil well in the Gulf of Mexico. Undersea robots manipulated by engineers a mile above will begin work Saturday removing the containment cap over the gushing well head in the Gulf of Mexico, the first part of a plan that could lead to the containment of all the oil as soon as Monday. The cap now in use was installed June 4 to capture oil gushing from the bottom of sea, but because it had to be fitted over a jagged cut in the well pipe, it allows some crude to escape into the Gulf. The new cap, dubbed "Top Hat Number 10" is designed to fit more snugly and help BP catch all the oil. (AP Photo/BP PLC)

Also Tuesday, the commission plans to take testimony from government officials, mainly those at the state and local level, so they can describe what’s happening from their perspective. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and coastal parish leaders have repeatedly expressed frustration at the federal red tape and BP delays that they say have impeded their response, particularly their efforts to protect hundreds of miles of delicate coastal marshes.

In addition, the seven commission members were to have toured the Gulf Coast over the weekend to see the response and cleanup work first-hand.

“The hearing is to give voice to the region,” Reilly said.

When hearing from people who work in the offshore oil industry and local government officials, the commission is sure to get an earful about the effects of the president’s deepwater drilling moratorium, imposed May 28 and now on hold in a contentious fight in federal court. An appeals court panel is expected to rule this week on whether U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman was correct in blocking the ban.

Obama initially suggested the commission could act more quickly than its six-month charge to provide interim recommendations that could help bring back safe drilling sooner. Reilly showed an interest in that, but by Friday he had cooled on it considerably. He said it was unlikely that the commission would come to sufficiently solid conclusions about industrywide drilling processes to be able to persuade the Department of Interior to allow work to resume before the moratorium expires in late November.

Besides, he said, a top Interior Department official made it clear to Reilly that the agency will chart its own course on the moratorium.

Graham said the commission will have some investigative functions, too, and will draw heavily from the findings of a Marine Board investigation started in early May and from sworn testimony given by eyewitnesses and oil company executives before various congressional committees.
Besides the co-chairmen, members of the commiission are, from top left, Frances Beinecke, Donald Boesch, Terry Garcia, Cherry Murray and Fran Ulmer. The video image of oil spewing from the Deepwater Horizon well in the Gulf of Mexico was recorded June 13.

Besides the co-chairmen, members of the commiission are, from top left, Frances Beinecke, Donald Boesch, Terry Garcia, Cherry Murray and Fran Ulmer. The video image of oil spewing from the Deepwater Horizon well in the Gulf of Mexico was recorded June 13.

The commission may be limited, however, by a lack of subpoena power, which congressional committees and the Marine Board use to compel witnesses to testify. For example, Reilly said a BP meeting in London conflicts with the New Orleans hearings and the commission was having trouble getting top executives to come. But he said the day after he was appointed, he called BP Chief Executive Tony Hayward, who pledged his support.

Graham said the House of Representatives has passed a bill granting the commission subpoena power and they’re hopeful the Senate will follow suit soon.

The commission is seeking $15 million to pay a staff of more than 30 researchers and investigators and to finance hearings and other activities. Graham said the House reduced that to $12 million, but it’s still pending Senate review. In the meantime, the commission is using $4 million from the Department of Energy’s budget to operate and hire staff.

The commission and its staff are a mix of environmentalists and energy industry insiders, although critics say it’s slanted toward anti-drilling types. The key staff includes research director Jay Hakes, the former head of the Energy Information Administration and the author of the book “A Declaration of Energy Independence,” and science adviser Richard Sears, a visiting scientist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Shell’s former vice president for exploration and deepwater technical evaluation.

Along with Graham and Reilly, the other members of the commission are: Frances Beinecke, head of the environmental group Natural Resources Defense Council; Don Boesch, president of the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science; Terry Garcia of the National Geographic Society; Cherry Murray, dean of the Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences; and Fran Ulmer, chancellor of the University of Alaska Anchorage and a former Alaska state legislator.

Coast Guard trains spotters for Gulf oil blimp duty

A helicopter takes off from Lakefront Airport as Navy blimp MZ-3A comes in for a landing Thursday. The blimp will be used in spotting oil from the BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

The Coast Guard has begun training spotters to work aboard a slow-moving, 178-foot-long Navy blimp that will add another airborne tool to the search for petroleum slicks and distressed wildlife from the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

The Coast Guard’s observers aboard the MZ-3A Airship, at least temporarily based at an airport near downtown Mobile, will help guide skimming vessels and wildlife rescuers responding to the massive crisis, officials said.

The all-white blimp, with a gondola that can carry as many as 10 people, cruises at a comparatively leisurely 55 mph at lower altitudes, and it can come to an almost complete stop if needed.

It’s expected to be far more effective than the Coast Guard’s HC-144 cargo airplane that often is used for Gulf flights. The plane has an average speed of 155 mph and flies at a minimum of 1,000 feet above the water, making it difficult to pinpoint oil or see animals on the surface of the water.

“This is another asset in the effort to respond to what is going on in the Gulf,” said Duane DeBruyne, a spokesman for the spill response command in Mobile.

DeBruyne said Coast Guard members who will work on the airship must undergo a day of safety and observer training on the ground before beginning additional training in the air.

“They have to be qualified just to go up,” he said. Training started Friday and was continuing Saturday.
View full size
Chuck Cook, The Associated Press
The Navy’s MZ3A airship descends to land at New Orleans Lakefront Airport on Thursday to support the largest oil spill response in U.S. history.

The Navy's MZ3A airship descends to land at New Orleans Lakefront Airport on Thursday to support the largest oil spill response in U.S. history.

Spotting oil from a blimp isn’t as simple as it sounds: It can be difficult to distinguish between streamers of burnt-orange oil and masses of brown seaweed from the air, and the shadows of clouds sometime resemble dark patches of oil in the water. Also, dead or dying marine animals on the Gulf surface can appear as mere dots from aloft.

The airship, manufactured by Oregon-based American Blimp Corp., arrived in Mobile on Friday after a one-night layover in New Orleans. A crew from Integrated Systems Solutions Inc., the Maryland-based company that operates the blimp for the Navy, drove stakes into the ground around a truck that has a tall, red-and-white mast used for mooring the airship on the ground.

The blimp bobbed in the afternoon breeze before training flights began. DeBryune said it was unclear when the aircraft would begin operating over the Gulf.

The blimp can stay aloft and work for 12 hours at a time, far longer than airplanes or helicopters. The Coast Guard said it also is more economical because it can monitor a far larger area than conventional aircraft. Normally based in California, the blimp is being outfitted with additional sensing equipment and communications gear for its time in the Gulf.

Dead zone in Gulf linked to oil

A dead hermit crabs lies in the water on a beach on Dauphin Island, Ala. An unusual low oxygen zone in Gulf of Mexico waters off the Alabama shore has lasted for more than a month.

An unusual low oxygen zone in Gulf of Mexico waters off the Alabama shore has persisted for more than a month, and evidence points to the ongoing Deepwater Horizon oil spill as the cause.

Oil spills can deplete oxygen in water by providing a source of food to microbes that grow on oil and consume oxygen in the process.

Researchers can’t say how low oxygen levels will affect the region’s ecosystem in the long term, but for now, most animals that can swim away have left the area. Plankton in the zone have died.

The researchers measured low oxygen levels along the entire 40-mile stretch they sampled around Dauphin Island, Ala., from about 40 miles offshore to within a mile or two of the shoreline. The bottom layer of water was oxygen-depleted at depths of about 30 feet close to shore to 100 feet further out, along the continental shelf — a rim of shallow water tracing the coast from Mississippi to Florida.

“It’s not little local pockets,” said Monty Graham of the Dauphin Island Sea Lab, who is tracking the zone. “It’s over a regional scale. It wouldn’t surprise me if there were a band of low oxygen over that entire area between the Mississippi River and Apalachicola, Florida.”

“The low oxygen was pushing up very close to the shore,” he added.

His team trawled the waters to survey wildlife.

Gulf Oil Spill: Cap Removed From Gushing Well, Oil Flows Freely


In this image taken from video provided by BP PLC, the arm of a remotely operated vehicle works at the Deepwater Horizon oil spill site in the Gulf of Mexico.

NEW ORLEANS — Robotic submarines removed the cap from the gushing well in the Gulf of Mexico on Saturday, beginning a period of at least two days when oil will flow freely into the sea.

It’s the first step in placing a tighter dome that is supposed to funnel more oil to collection ships on the surface a mile above. If all goes according to plan, the tandem of the tighter cap and the surface ships could keep all the oil from polluting the fragile Gulf as soon as Monday.

BP spokesman Mark Proegler said the old cap was removed at 12:37 p.m. CDT on Saturday.

“Over the next four to seven days, depending on how things go, we should get that sealing cap on. That’s our plan,” said Kent Wells, a BP senior vice president.

It would be only a temporary solution to the catastrophe unleashed by a drilling rig explosion nearly 12 weeks ago. It won’t plug the busted well and it remains uncertain that it will succeed.

The oil is flowing mostly unabated into the water for about 48 hours – long enough for as much as 5 million gallons to gush out – until the new cap is installed.

The hope for a permanent solution remains with two relief wells intended to plug it completely far beneath the seafloor.

Engineers now begin removing a bolted flange below the dome. The flange has to be taken off so another piece of equipment called a flange spool can go over the drill pipe, where the sealing cap will be connected.

The work could spill over into Sunday, Wells said, depending on how hard it is to pull off the flange. BP has a backup plan in case that doesn’t work: A piece of machinery will pry the top and the bottom of the flange apart.
Story continues below

On Friday, National Incident Commander Thad Allen had said the cap could be in place by Monday. That’s still possible, given the timeline BP submitted to the federal government, but officials say it could take up to a week of tests before it’s clear whether the new cap is working.

The cap now in use was installed June 4, but because it had to be fitted over a jagged cut in the well pipe, it allows some crude to escape. The new cap – dubbed “Top Hat Number 10” – follows 80 days of failures to contain or plug the leak.

BP PLC first tried a huge containment box also referred to as a top hat, but icelike crystals quickly clogged the contraption in the cold depths. Then it tried to shoot heavy drilling mud into the hole to hold down the flow so it could then insert a cement plug. After the so-called “top kill,” engineers tried a “junk shot” – using the undersea robots to try and stuff carefully selected golf balls and other debris to plug the leak. That also met failure.

The company is also working to hook up another containment ship called the Helix Producer to a different part of the leaking well. The ship, which will be capable of sucking up more than 1 million gallons a day when it is fully operating, should be working by Sunday, Allen said.

The plan had originally been to change the cap and hook up the Helix Producer separately, but the favorable weather convinced officials the time was right for both operations. They have a window of seven to 10 days.

The government estimates 1.5 million to 2.5 million gallons of oil a day are spewing from the well, and the existing cap is collecting about 1 million gallons of that. With the new cap and the new containment vessel, the system will be capable of capturing 2.5 million to 3.4 million gallons – essentially all the leaking oil, officials said.

In a response late Friday to Allen’s request for detailed plans, BP managing director Bob Dudley confirmed that the leak could be contained by Monday. But Dudley included plans for another scenario, which includes possible problems and missteps that could push the installment of the cap back to Thursday.

And the latest effort is far from a sure thing, warned Louisiana State University environmental sciences professor Ed Overton.

“Everything done at that site is very much harder than anyone expects,” he said. Overton said putting on the new cap carries risks: “Is replacing the cap going to do more damage than leaving it in place, or are you going to cause problems that you can’t take care of?”

Containing the leak will not end the crisis that began when the Deepwater Horizon drilling platform exploded April 20, killing 11 workers.

The relief wells are still being drilled so they can inject heavy mud and cement into the leaking well to stop the flow, which is expected to be done by mid-August. Then a monumental cleanup and restoration project lies ahead.

Some people on Louisiana’s oil-soaked coast were skeptical that BP can contain the oil so soon.

“This is probably the sixth or seventh method they’ve tried, so, no, I’m not optimistic,” said Deano Bonano, director of emergency preparedness for Jefferson Parish.

He inspected beaches at Grand Isle lined with protective boom and bustling with heavy equipment used to scoop up and clean sand.

“Even if they turn it off today, we’ll still be here at least another six weeks, on watch for the oil,” he said.

___

Associated Press Writer Kevin McGill in Grand Isle and Mary Foster in New Orleans contributed to this report.

Shell-Shocked Angler Catches Giant Turtle


An angler was left with a nasty surprise when he caught a giant turtle in a Midlands reservoir.

Huge turtle is now in quarantine

Steve Bellion, 23, was angling for carp when he hooked the 57lb (25kg) reptile at Earlswood Reservoir, near Birmingham.

He eventually hauled the 2ft-long creature on to the bank, and it was identified as an 80-year-old alligator snapping turtle, normally found in the eastern corner of the US.

The catch has solved a long mystery in local fishing circles – tales had abounded for a decade of a giant creature biting through lines and savaging ducks.

The ancient female was transferred by British Waterways to West Midland Safari Park, where it is being kept in quarantine for 30 days and checked by vets.

The turtle – which has yet to be named by its new keepers and can live to 160-years-old – will be housed in a vivarium with a male companion.

Bob Lawrence, director of wildlife at the safari park, said: “It’s looking fine, but so it should be having had half of Britain’s fish stocks at its mercy.

They have been known to attack small domestic pets or children, but I don’t think this one would have drifted too far from the water.
Bob Lawrence, director of wildlife at the safari park

“If it grew any larger it would have been a danger to shipping.”

He said it highlights the danger of introducing alien species into Britain’s waterways, in the same way that American signal crayfish have caused such depletion to fish stocks and the UK’s native crayfish.

And he said the problem is only likely to get worse with global warming.

“Thankfully alligator snapping turtles are a rarity in British waters – they can create havoc for native species,” he told Sky News Online.

“It was probably dumped by its owner after it grew too big or became a nuisance.

“They have been known to attack small domestic pets or children, but I don’t think this one would have drifted too far from the water.

“Because it has no natural predators, it could have lived to a ripe old age and grown to up to 80kg. I just hope there was only one and it didn’t have any offspring.”

1970s BP Board Game: Offshore Drilling Is Fun! (Which is a bunch of Bull, in my opinion)

“The thrills of drilling, the hazards and rewards as you bring in your own …”

Sound like the mantra of BP execs? Actually, it’s the tag line of an eerily prescient 1970s board game called “Offshore Oil Strike,” recently unearthed by the UK websiteMetro. The game, marketed by BP (naturally), sought to glamorize offshore drilling by positioning players as tycoons, pitted against against one another to gouge the most oil from their country.

Even the environmental and safety risks of the game were presented as something titillating. Players who drew “hazard cards” faced a rig blow-out and subsequent $1 million in fines (a price tag BP no doubt wishes it could get away with paying now). One imagines participants drawing the card and shaking their heads, as their teammates blithely chuckled nearby

The game has come out of the woodworks because a rare copy was passed along to The House On The Hill Toy Museum in Stansted, Essex. Museum owner Alan Goldsmith was intrigued by the game’s striking acumen, saying “‘The parallels between the game and the current crisis… are so spooky.” As he pointed out, the picture on the front of the box is particularly unnerving, with its isolated rig in a newly black sea, positioned above the words “an exciting board game for all the family.”

In the grand scheme of things, of course, the revelation of the game is an afterthought, a trivial and even humorous anecdote that provides some much-needed levity to the real-life oil spill devastation. But it also says something about the cavalier culture that BP—and its fellow tycoons in the oil business—have long perpetuated, through games, ads and pure PR spin: the powerful idea that oil drilling is a risky but fun adventure, bound up in the Wild West myth of exploration and conquest. The board game apparently wasn’t that popular, a fact which surprises me. After all, our culture has always been drawn to the the heat of danger. Just look at the success of Monopoly, a wildly popular board game predicated on reckless investments that has also taken on a creepy tone of late.

The fact of the matter is people (and corporations in particular) have always been intrigued by the idea of risk-taking because the reward always seems so satisfying. That’s why it’s easy to understand why players would be willing to face the penalty of a spill: If they avoided it, they could also collect a cool $120 million and score a win. BP may have just drawn a “hazard card” in real life, but something tells me they’ll keep fighting for that greenback victory.

Photo credit: Ebay.com

Obama Administration Set for Drill Ban Legal Fight

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Obama administration heads to court on Thursday aiming to reinstate a six-month moratorium on deepwater oil drilling imposed after the devastating BP Plc Gulf of Mexico oil spill, but blocked by a federal judge.

The showdown starts at 3 p.m. local time (2000 GMT) at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans, where government lawyers will square off for one hour against drilling companies before a three-judge panel.

Regardless of the ruling, industry is not expected to resume drilling in deep waters any time soon because of the legal uncertainties.

If the judges rule against the moratorium, companies will await the government’s next move: likely another appeal and also the issuance of a new moratorium.

Should the government wins its case, industry will hope the Obama administration revises the moratorium rules anyway to allow some projects to get going again.

The Obama administration said it suspended drilling in waters deeper than 500 feet to avoid another oil well blowout and give a special presidential commission time to investigate the disaster.
BP’s leaking undersea well in the Gulf of Mexico has soiled the shores of all five U.S. Gulf Coast states.

But drillers like Hornbeck Offshore Services Inc won a reprieve when U.S. District Court Judge Martin Feldman said the moratorium was too broad and arbitrary.

Feldman ruled last month that the Interior Department failed to adequately take into account the economic impact the drilling suspension would have on the industry as well as local communities.

The Justice Department, which appealed, will argue that Feldman wrongly substituted his judgment in place of Interior Department expertise and that the moratorium was narrow by only affecting drilling at 33 sites.

It will ask that his ruling be put on hold.

BACK TO WORK

The appeals court is expected to rule quickly after the rare oral argument on the stay request. Drilling companies want to get back to work, while the government wants to protect against another spill.

Additionally, the state of Louisiana has intervened in the case, telling the court that the drilling industry is worth $3 billion to its economy, which was just getting back on its feet after Hurricane Katrina in 2005.

While the drilling companies and the Obama administration squabble over the blanket moratorium, another complication emerging is a plan by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to issue a revised drilling suspension that might be more flexible in a bid to mollify critics.

Economic damage from the uncertainty is already being felt. Baker Hughes Inc said it is moving workers out of the Gulf of Mexico to other countries.

“Short-term, we’re relocating some of our people on the offshore rigs,” Baker Hughes CEO Chad Deaton said on Wednesday after a town hall meeting on the moratorium in Houston. “Fortunately, activity around the world is fairly strong.”

The legal uncertainties are also taking a bite out of future U.S. production. In its latest forecast, the Energy Department predicted U.S. oil output would be slashed by 82,000 barrels per day –about a week’s worth of production — next year due to delayed or canceled drilling caused by the moratorium.

The deepwater suspension came just over a month after an April 20 explosion that rocked the Transocean Ltd oil rig that was drilling the BP well, killing 11 workers and unleashing the oil spill.

Since the BP well exploded, drilling stocks have been hammered, with Transocean shares down 44 percent and Hornbeck shares down 24 percent, based on the close of regular trading on Wednesday.

The moratorium challenge in court “could give some of these (drillers’) stocks a lift in the near term,” said Channing Smith, co-portfolio manager of Tulsa, Oklahoma-based Capital Advisors Growth Fund.

More broadly, oil service stocks have taken a heavy beating since the spill and the Philadelphia oil services sector index has dropped 27 percent from its 2010 high hit in late April. The index bounced back in June but started July near the year’s lows and is now down 25 percent from the April highs.

(Additional reporting by Rodrigo Campos in New York and Anna Driver in Houston; Editing by Russ Blinch and Vicki Allen)

NEWS ABOUT BP OIL SPILL

Marine Life Affected:

WHAT OIL SPILLS WILL DO TO MARINE WILDLIFE:

TO DOLPHINS:

Unlike most animals, oil does not stick to a Dolphin’s skin because their skin is smooth, and hairless. That’s good. One less thing to worry about in the heap of other problems that BP has made for these highly intelligent mammals. The dolphins of the Gulf of Mexico will encounter problems such as inhaling oil and oil vapor (which they do very well). This will inevitably damage the animals’ airways, lungs, and mucous membranes. This, in turn, can lead to death. It’s the circle of life, BP style, and the dolphins are panicking their way in circles to death. Oh yeah, just so you know, they can increase their exposure to oil harm if they’re stressed or panicking. Wonderful.
– A dolphin’s eyesight is also sensitive to oil exposure.
– It is also possible that oil pollution impairs a dolphin’s immune system and causes secondary bacterial and fungal infections.
– The transfer of petroleum hydrocarbons through the mothers milk to suckling young is another way oil affects dolphins and may affect not only current dolphin populations, but future generations.
– Dolphins are marine mammals that are closely related to whales and porpoises. They are found worldwide, mostly in the shallower seas of the continental shelves, and are carnivores, mostly eating fish and squid. They might consume oil-affected food or may even starve due to the lack of available food given that in the gulf area they are pretty much at the top of the food chain.

TO MANATEES:

Manatees may be affected by inhaling volatile hydrocarbons while they are breathing on the surface, and it is very likely that exposure to petroleum will irritate sensitive mucous membranes and eyes. Those adorable little eyes. The young are the most at risk (read: manatee pups). Nursing pups may be injured due to ingestion of oil from contaminated teats. There may be long-term chronic effects as a result of migration through oil-contaminated waters, and there is a substantial possibility of consuming contaminated plant material and other incidental organisms that may affect GENERATIONS of manatees (much like the dolphins)

– fully aquatic, mostly herbivorous marine mammals sometimes known as ‘sea cows’. They’re well-known for their friendly nature and paddle-like flippers.
– Hair color is brownish gray and they have thick, wrinkled skin, often with coarse hair, or “whiskers.” This adorable big guy spends half the day sleeping.
– Are capable of understanding discriminatory tasks and show signs of complex thought associated with learning and advanced long-term memory.
– Inhabit the shallow, marshy coastal areas and rivers of the Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico, as well as other regions with warmer water. Diet includes mangrove leaves, turtle grass, and types of algae, all of which will be filled/covered with a layer of oil due to this last spill.

TO YOUNG HERON:

Impair reproduction. Studies have shown that ‘microliter’ quantities of fresh oil applied to the eggshell surface will cause death of the embryo. Birds exposed to sublethal quantities of oil during the nesting season can transfer oil onto their feathers, and then to their eggs, causing failure of the eggs to hatch.

– Underneath Mangrove, just inside the coast of Lousiana. The is home to hundreds of herons, brown pelicans, terns, gulls and roseate spoonbills.
– Almost all of these species are associated with water, they are essentially non-swimming waterbirds that feed on the margins of lakes, rivers, swamps, ponds and the sea.
– Majority found in tropics
– The diet includes a wide variety of aquatic animals, including fish, reptiles, amphibians, crustaceans, molluscs and aquatic insects

TO SEA TURTLES:

– Sea turtles such as loggerheads and leatherbacks can be impacted as they swim to shore for nesting activities. Turtle nest eggs may be damaged if an oiled adult lies on the nest. All species of sea turtles are listed as threatened or endangered.
– Dr. Solangi’s center recovered 13 sea turtles that had washed ashore, said to be the first victims of the BP oil spill.

– Inhabitants in all areas of the ocean and beach/dunes, except the arctic. A lifespan of 80 years is feasible for sea turtles. Sea turtles play 2 critical roles in ecosystem types – oceans and beaches/dunes. Green sea turtles eat sea grass that grows at the bottom of the ocean. Sea grass must be kept short in order to remain healthy, and beds of healthy sea grass are essential in areas of breeding and development for species of fish and marine life; making sea turtles (in jeopardy now more than ever) an INTEGRAL part of the ecosystem in the Gulf.
– Beach dunes depend on vegetation to protect against erosion, and turtle eggs that fail make it to the ocean, hatched or not, are nutrient sources for vegetation. If sea turtles become extinct, there will be a negative impact in both marine and human life.

TO LEAST TURNS:

– There is a potential for the oil spill to wipe out the entire population of Least Terns.
– Terns were once plentiful in Biloxi, Mississippi with 12,000 species living. Now there are only 2,000.
– Right now, least tern eggs are at a critical point in their life cycle because they’re the most vulnerable to the oil. It takes about 20 days for least terns eggs to hatch, and another 20 days to leave the nest.
http://cbs5.com/national/gulf.oil.spill.2.1674709.html
– A species of tern that breeds in North America and locally in northern South America. Sea birds have a high risk of contact to spilled oil due to the amount of time they spend on or near the surface of the sea and on oil affected foreshores.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_Tern

TO SHARKS:

-Given the amount of time whale sharks spend in, and at the surface of the water, there is potential harm or possible death of these mammals from direct exposure to the oil as well as contamination, typically from oiling or clogging of their gills, and consumption of oil-contaminated preys. Most of these animals spend a large percentage of their time filter feeding, so the impact of the spill will be tremendous.
-The process being used to ‘break up’ the oil will significantly increase the potential for exposure of sharks throughout the water.
-Although it is unclear whether or not sharks have the ability to detect the oil in the water, we can only hope that they will avoid these affected areas.
-Whale sharks are considered ‘vulnerable’ species because of their slow growth rate, late age maturity and low number of off springs. The oil spill will definitely impact the wildlife of Whale sharks in the Gulf of Mexico. If the BP oil spill causes the shark population to decline, there will be a slow recovery within the shark colony.

TO WHOOPING CRANE:

– Birds can be exposed to oil as they float on the water or dive for fish through oil-slicked water. Oiled birds can lose the ability to fly and can ingest the oil while preening.
– This bird feeds on various crustaceans, mollusks, fish, berries, small reptiles and aquatic plants. Potential foods of breeding birds in summer include frogs, small rodents, smaller birds, fish, aquatic insects, crayfish, clams, snails, aquatic tubers and, berries. Waste grain, including wheat and barley, is an important food for migratory birds such as the whooping crane. All affected (INfected) by this oil spill.
– These devastating outcomes give the creatures nothing to whoop about — if they CAN even whoop anymore without oil spouting out their throats or choking them them to death.
– The tallest North American bird, the Whooping Crane is an endangered crane species named for its whooping sound and call.
– The whooping crane is endangered mainly as a result of habitat loss. Breeding populations winter along the Gulf coast of Texas, as well as other areas with lakes. They nest on the ground, usually on a raised area in a marsh. Female is more likely to directly tend to the young.

TO SNOWY PLOVER:

– The snowy plover is possibly the most adorable bird to be affected by the oil spill. It has been designated to a watch-list and is considered an endangered species in the West Coast. Snowy plovers would be severely affected by oil on the beaches of the Gulf of Mexico.
– Read more: http://www.thedailygreen.com/environmental-news/latest/birds-gulf-oil-spill-0519#ixzz0pNdhw0Nf
– Plovers have already stopped nesting as a result of the oil spill.

– Often found at or near beaches. In many parts of the world, it has become difficult for this species to breed on beaches because of disturbance from the activities of humans or their animals.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowy_Plover

TO PELICANS:

Some brown pelicans couldn’t fly away this Memorial Day weekend’s Sunday. All they could do was hobble; their beautiful brown and white feathers now covered in jet black oil.
– The pelicans struggled to clean the crude from their bodies, splashing in the water and trying to preen themselves and their young. One stood at the edge of an island with its wings lifted slightly, its head drooping — so encrusted in oil it couldn’t fly.
– Pelicans are especially vulnerable to oil. Not only could they eat tainted fish and feed it to their young, but they could die of hypothermia or drown if they’re soaked in oil and rendered immobile.
– A pelican is a large water bird with a large throat pouch, belonging to the bird family Pelecanidae. They’re birds of inland and coastal waters, mostly found in warm regions.

TO CRABS:

– An accumulation of toxins in small organisms, such as snails and mole crabs, could hamper their reproduction. A decline in what blue crabs are eating could then hinder their own growth and survival. Contaminated food could also affect blue crab reproduction, thereby impacting the next generation.
– If they ingest tainted food, female blue crabs will inadvertently put the viability of their eggs and stored sperm at risk, resulting in an inordinate number of eggs being laid that aren’t fertile, endangering a very important crab for the U.S., Louisiana and the ecosystem.
– The United States is the world’s most important blue crab fishery. Its top producing state is Louisiana. Oil that’s been broken up bydispersants will affect all crabs’ food source, which consists primarily of snails and mole crabs

EVIL, EVIL: RECAPS OF BP EVIL:

Here are some recaps of the  evil things from BP:

BP is now burning dead marine life at night to cover up the damage.

From the start, Obama administration and BP officials lied and deceived the public about the Gulf spill’s severity, BP CEO Tony Hayward saying (on May 18) its environmental effect will be “very modest,” when, in fact, it’s already catastrophic, spreading, causing long-term or permanent ecological destruction over a vast area, will likely persist for months, and, according to some experts perhaps years if nothing tried to stop it works.
Initially, BP reported a 1,000 barrels per day leak, then 5,000 after the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) estimate, while independent analysis of company supplied video and satellite imagery suggest somewhere between 50 – 100,000 barrels, the consensus settling on 70,000 or an Exxon Valdez equivalent every 3.5 days – by far, America’s greatest ever environmental disaster, worsening daily.
On May 19, McClatchy Newspapers Marisa Taylor and Renee Schoof headlined, “BP Withholds Oil Spill Facts – and Government Lets It,” saying:
It “hasn’t publicly divulged the results of tests on the extent of workers’ exposure to evaporating oil or from the burning of crude….even though researchers say that data is crucial in determining whether the conditions are safe.”
Further, BP isn’t monitoring conditions or releasing videos, and the Obama administration isn’t pressing it despite experts, like University of Miami’s fisheries biologist Peter Ortner saying “We have been screaming from day one for” it.
Meanwhile, University of Miami’s Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science’s satellite imagery analysis reported on May 18 that the spill covers 7,500 square miles, or about the size of New Jersey. Other accounts say 10,000 square miles or a Maryland equivalent. Either way, it’s huge.
On May 19, McClatchy Newspaper writers Renee Schoof and Lauren French headlined, “Gulf oil spill may be 19 times bigger than originally thought,” saying:
New video footage “indicates that around 95,000 barrels, or 4 million gallons, a day of crude oil may be spewing from the leaking wellhead,” according to Purdue University’s Professor Steve Wereley’s May 19 testimony to the House Commerce and Energy Committee. He based his calculation on BP video, saying the spill could be from 76,000 – 104,000 barrels daily, but wants more footage over a longer period for a more precise calculation, what BP hasn’t released up to now and won’t, absent Interior Department pressure to do it.
Yet if the wellhead fails completely, these figures potentially could double, begging the question about how long Washington, BP, and the major media can deny the peril, pretending it’s minor.
Wereley said the “media keeps using the 5,000 (figure), but there is scientifically” no basis for its accuracy. “BP’s estimate is nowhere near correct. It is certainly larger.” He sees no “possibility (under) any scenario (that the publicized) number is accurate,” imagine how much less so under a worst case scenario.
On May 14, the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) “filed a formal notice of intent to sue Interior Secretary Ken Salazar for ignoring marine-mammal protection laws when approving offshore drilling operations in the Gulf of Mexico.”
Salazar’s Interior Department approved “three lease sales, more than 100 seismic surveys, and more than 300 drilling operations without permits required by the Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Endangered Species Act.”
According to CBD’s oceans director, Miyoko Sakashita:
On Salazar’s watch, the Gulf was treated “as a sacrifice area where laws are ignored and wildlife protection takes a backseat to oil-company profits.” The Interior Department “is well aware of its obligations under the law….yet it has simply decided it cannot be bothered. You and I have to follow the law, but Interior Secretary Salazar seems to think that he and the oil companies he is supposedly overseeing do not. That is unacceptable.”
CBD is suing Salazar and the Minerals Management Service (MMS) for flagrantly violating the Marine Mammal Protection Act and Endangered Species Act. Hundreds of individual and class action ones have begun coming against BP, Transocean, Halliburton and their complicit corporate partners for compensatory and punitive damages, but whatever their resolutions, they’ll never compensate for lost livelihoods, destroyed lives, and environmental devastation that courts can’t redress.
Of course, the problem goes back decades and was extreme under the Bush-Cheney White House, run by former oil men who cared only about profits, and didn’t give a damn about the environment. Neither does Obama and his corporate-controlled administration.
In 2007, Bush’s Interior Department sold BP the affected lease under its 2007 – 2012 Five-Year Offshore Oil Drilling Plan. In April 2009, the Obama administration approved exploratory drilling, after which CBD and its allies won a court order vacating the Bush Five-Year Plan.
Rather than seek an alternative, Interior Secretary Salazar filed a special motion to exempt approved Gulf sites, identifying BP’s as one to be allowed. In July 2009, the court agreed, despite BP having the worst environmental and safety records of any company operating in America.
No matter. It downplayed a spill possibility, saying it was unlikely or virtually impossible.MMS then rubber-stamped its exploration plan with no environmental consideration. In other words, it should never deter business or stand in the way of profits – the same attitude shown Wall Street, corporate health providers, and other corporate favorites given generous legislative or direct handouts.
As a result, regular large and smaller spills are assured, heavy oil from this one having reached the fragile Louisiana marshlands – nurseries for shrimp, oysters, crabs, and fish that make Louisiana America’s leading commercial seafood producer and a favorite tourist destination for recreational anglers.
Oil also now affects the South Pass Mississippi River entrance, the Mississippi delta, Gulf Shores and Dauphin Island, Alabama, Whiskey Island on the Chandeleur Islands south end, the protected bird breeding sanctuary Raccoon Island, and the Loop Current, a powerful clockwise conveyor belt heading it toward Florida, up the East Coast, and into the Atlantic, threatening Western Europe and perhaps West Africa. The potential devastation is incalculable but at minimum will be huge.
According to European Space Agency satellite images, visible proof shows its position, suggesting it’ll reach the Keys around May 25, America’s only living coral barrier reef – the world’s third most productive marine ecosystem with its patch and bank reefs, seagrass meadows, soft and hard bottom communities, and coastal mangroves. They support one of North America’s most biologically diverse amounts of marine life, endangering them, according to Dr. Hu Chuamin, executive director of the Institute for Marine Remote Sensing (IMaRS) at the University of South Florida.
An optical oceanographic expert, he says there’s “no doubt that (oil) will reach the Florida Keys. (Advancing about 100 miles a day), we know that (Mississippi Rivers waters are heading for) the Florida Straits and will impact the Keys.” Once there, major damage is likely to an ecosystem providing shelter, food and breeding sites for many plants and animals as well as coastal storm protection. According to Florida’s Department of Environmental Protection, reefs also help the state’s economy through millions of dollars annually from recreational and commercial fishing.
No one knows the potential damage, but if oil flows over the reef, the amount will depend on whether it stays on the surface. According to Eugene Shinn, recently retired US Geologic Service reef ecology expert, “Under no circumstances should dispersants be used on an oil slick in the vicinity of a coral reef.” They would cause oil droplets to sink and potentially destroy tiny coral polyps.
Worse still, the Loop Current joins the Gulf Stream, North America’s most important ocean current system, sparking fears about oil entering it and traveling up the entire East Coast into the Atlantic. En route, it could foul beaches, mangroves, sea-grass, and coral reefs, vital to area wildlife, local economies and human health, besides crossing the Atlantic for more damage.
Earlier, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) head ,JaneLubchenco, told reporters that an “unprecedented and dynamic” slick was on course to sweep along Florida’s coastline, was “increasingly likely” to reach the powerful Gulf Loop, then be carried to the Keys and beyond.
No doubt to prevent his congressional testimony, MMS associate director of Offshore Energy and Minerals Management, Chris Oynes, will take an accelerated retirement May 31. He got his position despite being key to an offshore leasing foul-up, costing taxpayers an estimated $10 billion in lost revenue – the Interior Department’s inspector general calling his mismanagement “a jaw-dropping example of bureaucratic bungling.”
So bad, in fact, he got a better job to rubber-stamp BP’s right to operate recklessly, wreck the environment, and reward its shareholders with billions in profits. Maybe a new high-paying job as well, the usual revolving door payoff for allies leaving government service.
BP’s Criminal Negligence
Besides lying, covering up, and deceiving all along, BP knew the vital blowout preventer was damaged weeks before the spill, yet did nothing to fix it, according to a May 17 Judith Evans Timesonline report headlined, “BP pressured rig disaster workers to drill faster,” saying:
According to chief electronics technician Mike Williams, one of the last workers to leave the doomed platform, the blowout preventer was “damaged when a crewman accidently moved a joystick, applying hundreds of thousands of pounds of force. Pieces of rubber were found in the drilling fluid, which he said implied damage to a crucial seal. But a supervisor declared the find to be ‘not a big deal.’ “
Engineering Professor Bob Bea disagreed, telling 60 Minutes that inaccurate pressure readings followed. The real situation was concealed. The rig no longer was safe, and without blowout preventer protection, “a catastrophic accident like the Gulf oil spill” might happen.
Bea also said BP ignored an even more critical safety measure, ordering the rig operator to remove the “drilling mud,” the heavy liquid used before the well was sealed to keep oil and gas from escaping.
MMS drilling engineer Frank Patton calls drilling mud “the most important thing in safety for your well.” Explosion eyewitnesses, including nearby fishermen, saw it being extracted beforehand. BP told rig workers that “things” were plugged when, in fact, final cementing wasn’t in place. Without it and the drilling mud, an operable blowout preventer was the last line of defense. Drilling without it was willful criminal negligence.
So wasn’t the whole operation, approved by Obama’s Interior Department, including EPA’s authorizing the use of toxic dispersants, causing more problems than solutions to the environment, wildlife, affected residents, and fishermen hired as first responders, already getting sick.
BP said respirators and other special protections weren’t needed, despite strong hydrocarbon vapors and massive toxic chemical amounts dumped on the slick to make it more water soluble.
As a result, fishermen report bad headaches, burning eyes, persistent coughs, sore throats, stuffy sinuses, nausea, and dizziness – unsurprising based on EPA monitored unsafe airborne levels of dangerous hydrogen sulfide, benzene and other toxins, way exceeding acceptable standards for humans and wildlife.
BP and Washington ignore them, risking chemical poisoning to show up later in long-term illnesses, disabilities and deaths, what happened to Exxon Valdez and 9/11 first responders, never told of the dangers they faced. Again, expediency and corporate interests trump environmental considerations, public health, worker safety, and common sense – swept aside by Washington-BP collusion.
On May 20, with over 600,000 gallons of surface dispersants used and another 55,000 underwater, the EPA told BP officials to choose less toxic ones in 24 hours, submit a list of alternatives, then begin using them within 72 hours.
According to Washington Post writer Juliet Eilperin (on May 20) in her article titled, “EPA demands less-toxic dispersant:”
An unnamed administration official said “Dispersants have never been used in this volume before,” let alone ones as toxic as Nalco’s Corexit 9500A and 9527A.
Nalco is well-connected, having formed a joint venture with Exxon Chemical in 1994, has oil-industry insiders on its board, including an 11-year BP board member. No wonder Defenders of Wildlife’s senior policy advisor, Richard Charter, calls Corexit “a chemical that the oil industry makes to sell to itself, basically.” Only profits matter, not long-term harm to people, wildlife and the environment.
Washington Coverup of a Massive Underwater Oil Blob
According to investigative journalist Wayne Madsen in his May 20 article headlined, “White House Covers Up Menacing Oil ‘Blob:’ “
FEMA and US Army Corps of Engineer sources say that “US Navy submarines (in the Gulf and Atlantic off the Florida coast) have detected (and are tracking) what amounts to a frozen oil blob….at depths of between 3,000 to 4,000 feet. (It’s now) transiting the Florida Straits between Florida and Cuba (and parts of it) are breaking off into smaller tar balls that are now washing ashore in the environmentally-sensitive Florida Keys and Dry Tortugas.”
Lies and coverup try to hide it, Madsen saying NOAA operates as a “virtual public relations arm for BP,” and the Coast Guard is “lying in order to protect the Obama administration” to limit its damaged image.
Six months ago, without federally required permits, the BP/Transocean/Halliburton troika drilled a 35,000 foot well, causing “a major catastrophic event that required the firms’ oil rig personnel to quickly pull up the drill and close (its) hole.”
Even so, BP “re-sank the drill (causing) another, more destructive chain of events following the (Deepwater Horizon) explosion….When (it) blew up, (it) also ‘blew down,’ cracking the sub-seabed pipe” as deep as 30,000 feet, “again, without a government permit.”
BP also wants to recover “as much oil as possible from the (site) rather than simply plugging and capping (it), which would then place it off-limits to further drilling.”
Company officials are deceiving the Obama administration and public about their so-called “kill shot” or “top kill” plan to permanently seal the well. Instead, they intend “to shoot cement into the pipe in an attempt to cap” it temporarily, later hoping to dig “a trench for side drilling (to) recover as much oil as possible,” no matter the risk of an even greater disaster that won’t deter their quest for profits.
The Exxon Valdez Connection
Greg Palast’s Exxon Valdez fraud investigations found BP mostly to blame, a topic his May 5 Truthout.org article explained, titled “Slick Operator: The BP I’ve Known Too Well.”
What the company did to Alaska, it’s now doing to the Gulf, and a vastly greater ecosystem under a worst case scenario. “Tankers run aground, wells blow out, pipes burst. It shouldn’t happen, but it does (after which) the name of the game is containment,” coverup, and spending the least amount possible for cleanup and restitution.
In Alaska and today, BP “was charged with carrying out the Oil Spill Response Plans (it)drafted….filed with the government, and is handling the same way by “l(ying),prevaricat(ing), fabricat(ing) and obfuscat(ing).”
Spills are contained with “lot(‘s) of rubber, long skirts of it called a ‘boom’ (used to) surround (them), then pump (them) out into skimmers, or disperse it, sink it or burn it.”
However, “booms” have to be ready to respond like a fire department’s equipment and personnel to operate it. In Alaska, it was BP’s job as principal Alyeska pipeline consortium owner – its same job in the Gulf as principal Deepwater Horizon lessee.
In 1989, Alyeska claimed that equipment and response crews were in place with trained Alaskan natives ready if needed. It also “certified in writing that a containment barge with equipment was within five hours sailing of any point in the Prince William Sound, (and that) it had plenty of boom and equipment cached on Bligh Island, where the Exxon Valdez hitBligh Reef.
In fact, it had nothing there, and Alyeska earlier fired Alaskan workers, “replacing them with phantom crews, lists of untrained employees with no idea how to control a spill. And the containment barge (in fact was) laid up in a drydock in Cordova, locked under ice, 12 hours away.” Instead of containing the spill, 1,200 miles of shoreline were wrecked, contaminated enough to remain so for decades at minimum.
For a company with the worst safety and environmental record in the industry “here we go again. Valdez goes Cajun” with contagion enough to contaminate vast parts of the Gulf, Florida Keys, fragile ecosystems, and the entire US East coast and beyond.
This goes way beyond BP and its decades of criminal negligence. It’s a regulatory problem for lack of it; a government one for no oversight, public or environmental concern; and a long-term systemic one giving business free reign to plunder and pollute without limit, then when caught call it an accident, paper it over, and repeat again because complicit government officials allow it.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

How do you stop oil from spewing from a chasm the size of Mount Everest?  This Mega-Disaster is being hidden from the American people, otherwise, there would be panic in the cities and states who WILL feel the immediate effect.  NEXT, hurricane storms can and will dump this oil in internal fresh water in these states.

It also appears the Obama administration, who is conspiring with BP,  could Nationalize BP and put a ceiling on claims for damages.

Please read this entire article for more information on what is happening and what they are trying to do to stop.  It appears it cannot be stopped, at this time.

There are 30,000 other rigs with the same potential for erupting.  Lack of inspections and lax regulations to increase profits.  Their arrogance will cause the worst oil disaster in the history of the world.

Plans must be made to evacuate people with respiratory conditions when they attempt to burn off the oil.  The smell has already reached land, and if you didn’t have breathing problems before, you will once this is over, and that could be the least of the cause-and-effect outcomes.

************

WMR has been informed by sources in the US Army Corps of Engineers, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and Florida Department of Environmental Protection that the Obama White House and British Petroleum (BP), which pumped $71,000 into Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign — more than John McCain or Hillary Clinton–, are covering up the magnitude of the volcanic-level oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico and working together to limit BP’s liability for damage caused by what can be called a “mega-disaster.”

There is other satellite imagery being withheld by the Obama administration that shows what lies under the gaping chasm spewing oil at an ever-alarming rate is a cavern estimated to be around the size of Mount Everest. This information has been given an almost national security-level classification to keep it from the public, according to our sources.

********

The Cover-up – BP’s Crude Politics and the Looming Environmental Mega-Disaster

By Wayne Madsen for Global Research

WMR has been informed by sources in the US Army Corps of Engineers, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and Florida Department of Environmental Protection that the Obama White House and British Petroleum (BP), which pumped $71,000 into Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign — more than John McCain or Hillary Clinton–, are covering up the magnitude of the volcanic-level oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico and working together to limit BP’s liability for damage caused by what can be called a “mega-disaster.”

Obama and his senior White House staff, as well as Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, are working with BP’s chief executive officer Tony Hayward on legislation that would raise the cap on liability for damage claims from those affected by the oil disaster from $75 million to $10 billion. However, WMR’s federal and Gulf state sources are reporting the disaster has the real potential cost of at least $1 trillion. Critics of the deal being worked out between Obama and Hayward point out that $10 billion is a mere drop in the bucket for a trillion dollar disaster but also note that BP, if its assets were nationalized, could fetch almost a trillion dollars for compensation purposes. There is talk in some government circles, including FEMA, of the need to nationalize BP in order to compensate those who will ultimately be affected by the worst oil disaster in the history of the world.

Plans by BP to sink a 4-story containment dome over the oil gushing from a gaping chasm one kilometer below the surface of the Gulf, where the oil rig Deepwater Horizon exploded and killed 11 workers on April 20, and reports that one of the leaks has been contained is pure public relations disinformation designed to avoid panic and demands for greater action by the Obama administration, according to FEMA and Corps of Engineers sources. Sources within these agencies say the White House has been resisting releasing any “damaging information” about the oil disaster. They add that if the ocean oil geyser is not stopped within 90 days, there will be irreversible damage to the marine eco-systems of the Gulf of Mexico, north Atlantic Ocean, and beyond. At best, some Corps of Engineers experts say it could take two years to cement the chasm on the floor of the Gulf.

Only after the magnitude of the disaster became evident did Obama order Homeland Security Secretary JanetNapolitano to declare the oil disaster a “national security issue.” Although the Coast Guard and FEMA are part of her department, Napolitano’s actual reasoning for invoking national security was to block media coverage of the immensity of the disaster that is unfolding for the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean and their coastlines.

From the Corps of Engineers, FEMA, the Environmental Protection Agency, Coast Guard, and Gulf state environmental protection agencies, the message is the same: “we’ve never dealt with anything like this before.”

The Obama administration also conspired with BP to fudge the extent of the oil leak, according to our federal and state sources. After the oil rig exploded and sank, the government stated that 42,000 gallons per day was gushing from the seabed chasm.  Five days later, the federal government upped the leakage to 210,000 gallons a day.

However, WMR has been informed that submersibles that are  monitoring the escaping oil from the Gulf seabed are viewing television pictures of what is a “volcanic-like” eruption of oil. Moreover, when the Army Corps of Engineers first attempted to obtain NASA imagery of the Gulf oil slick — which is larger than that being reported by the media — it was turned down. However, National Geographic managed to obtain the satellite imagery shots of the extent of the disaster and posted them on their web site.

There is other satellite imagery being withheld by the Obama administration that shows what lies under the gaping chasm spewing oil at an ever-alarming rate is a cavern estimated to be around the size of Mount Everest. This information has been given an almost national security-level classification to keep it from the public, according to our sources.

The Corps and Engineers and FEMA are quietly critical of the lack of support for quick action after the oil disaster by the Obama White House and the US Coast Guard. Only recently, has the Coast Guard understood the magnitude of the disaster, dispatching nearly 70 vessels to the affected area. WMR has also learned that inspections of off-shore rigs’ shut-off valves by the Minerals Management Service during the Bush administration were merely rubber-stamp operations, resulting from criminal collusion between Halliburton and the Interior Department’s service, and that the potential for similar disasters exists with the other 30,000 off-shore rigs that use the same shut-off valves.

The impact of the disaster became known to the Corps of Engineers and FEMA even before the White House began to take the magnitude of the impending catastrophe seriously. The first casualty of the disaster is the seafood industy, with not just fishermen, oystermen, crabbers, and shrimpers losing their jobs, but all those involved in the restaurant industry, from truckers to waitresses, facing lay-offs.

The invasion of crude oil into estuaries like the oyster-rich Apalachicola Bay in Florida spell disaster for the seafood industry. However, the biggest threat is to Florida’s Everglades, which federal and state experts fear will be turned into a “dead zone” if the oil continues to gush forth from the Gulf chasm. There are also expectations that the oil slick will be caught up in the Gulf stream off the eastern seaboard of the United States, fouling beaches and estuaries like the Chesapeake Bay, and ultimately target the rich fishing grounds of the Grand Banks off Newfoundland.

WMR has also learned that 36 urban areas on the Gulf of Mexico are expecting to be confronted with a major disaster from the oil volcano in the next few days. Although protective water surface boons are being laid to protect such sensitive areas as Alabama’s Dauphin Island, the mouth of the Mississippi River, and Florida’s Apalachicola Bay, Florida, there is only 16 miles of boons available for the protection of 2,276 miles of tidal shoreline in the state of Florida.

Emergency preparations in dealing with the expanding oil menace are now being made for cities and towns from Corpus Christi, Texas, to Houston, New Orleans, Gulfport, Mobile, Pensacola, Tampa-St.Petersburg-Clearwater,Sarasota-Bradenton, Naples, and Key West. Some 36 FEMA-funded contracts between cities, towns, and counties and emergency workers are due to be invoked within days, if not hours, according to WMR’s FEMA sources.

There are plans to evacuate people with respiratory problems, especially those among the retired senior population along the west coast of Florida, before officials begin burning surface oil as it begins to near the coastline.

There is another major threat looming for inland towns and cities. With hurricane season in effect, there is a potential for ocean oil to be picked up by hurricane-driven rains and dropped into fresh water lakes and rivers, far from the ocean, thus adding to the pollution of water supplies and eco-systems.

How do you stop oil from spewing from a chasm the size of Mount Everest?  This Mega-Disaster is being hidden from the American people, otherwise, there would be panic in the cities and states who WILL feel the immediate effect.  NEXT, hurricane storms can and will dump this oil in internal fresh water in these states.

It also appears the Obama administration, who is conspiring with BP,  could Nationalize BP and put a ceiling on claims for damages.

Please read this entire article for more information on what is happening and what they are trying to do to stop.  It appears it cannot be stopped, at this time.

There are 30,000 other rigs with the same potential for erupting.  Lack of inspections and lax regulations to increase profits.  Their arrogance will cause the worst oil disaster in the history of the world.

Plans must be made to evacuate people with respiratory conditions when they attempt to burn off the oil.  The smell has already reached land, and if you didn’t have breathing problems before, you will once this is over, and that could be the least of the cause-and-effect outcomes.

************

WMR has been informed by sources in the US Army Corps of Engineers, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and Florida Department of Environmental Protection that the Obama White House and British Petroleum (BP), which pumped $71,000 into Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign — more than John McCain or Hillary Clinton–, are covering up the magnitude of the volcanic-level oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico and working together to limit BP’s liability for damage caused by what can be called a “mega-disaster.”

There is other satellite imagery being withheld by the Obama administration that shows what lies under the gaping chasm spewing oil at an ever-alarming rate is a cavern estimated to be around the size of Mount Everest. This information has been given an almost national security-level classification to keep it from the public, according to our sources.

********

The Cover-up – BP’s Crude Politics and the Looming Environmental Mega-Disaster

By Wayne Madsen for Global Research

WMR has been informed by sources in the US Army Corps of Engineers, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and Florida Department of Environmental Protection that the Obama White House and British Petroleum (BP), which pumped $71,000 into Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign — more than John McCain or Hillary Clinton–, are covering up the magnitude of the volcanic-level oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico and working together to limit BP’s liability for damage caused by what can be called a “mega-disaster.”

Obama and his senior White House staff, as well as Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, are working with BP’s chief executive officer Tony Hayward on legislation that would raise the cap on liability for damage claims from those affected by the oil disaster from $75 million to $10 billion. However, WMR’s federal and Gulf state sources are reporting the disaster has the real potential cost of at least $1 trillion. Critics of the deal being worked out between Obama and Hayward point out that $10 billion is a mere drop in the bucket for a trillion dollar disaster but also note that BP, if its assets were nationalized, could fetch almost a trillion dollars for compensation purposes. There is talk in some government circles, including FEMA, of the need to nationalize BP in order to compensate those who will ultimately be affected by the worst oil disaster in the history of the world.

Plans by BP to sink a 4-story containment dome over the oil gushing from a gaping chasm one kilometer below the surface of the Gulf, where the oil rig Deepwater Horizon exploded and killed 11 workers on April 20, and reports that one of the leaks has been contained is pure public relations disinformation designed to avoid panic and demands for greater action by the Obama administration, according to FEMA and Corps of Engineers sources. Sources within these agencies say the White House has been resisting releasing any “damaging information” about the oil disaster. They add that if the ocean oil geyser is not stopped within 90 days, there will be irreversible damage to the marine eco-systems of the Gulf of Mexico, north Atlantic Ocean, and beyond. At best, some Corps of Engineers experts say it could take two years to cement the chasm on the floor of the Gulf.

Only after the magnitude of the disaster became evident did Obama order Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to declare the oil disaster a “national security issue.” Although the Coast Guard and FEMA are part of her department, Napolitano’s actual reasoning for invoking national security was to block media coverage of the immensity of the disaster that is unfolding for the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean and their coastlines.

From the Corps of Engineers, FEMA, the Environmental Protection Agency, Coast Guard, and Gulf state environmental protection agencies, the message is the same: “we’ve never dealt with anything like this before.”

The Obama administration also conspired with BP to fudge the extent of the oil leak, according to our federal and state sources. After the oil rig exploded and sank, the government stated that 42,000 gallons per day was gushing from the seabed chasm.  Five days later, the federal government upped the leakage to 210,000 gallons a day.

However, WMR has been informed that submersibles that are  monitoring the escaping oil from the Gulf seabed are viewing television pictures of what is a “volcanic-like” eruption of oil. Moreover, when the Army Corps of Engineers first attempted to obtain NASA imagery of the Gulf oil slick — which is larger than that being reported by the media — it was turned down. However, National Geographic managed to obtain the satellite imagery shots of the extent of the disaster and posted them on their web site.

There is other satellite imagery being withheld by the Obama administration that shows what lies under the gaping chasm spewing oil at an ever-alarming rate is a cavern estimated to be around the size of Mount Everest. This information has been given an almost national security-level classification to keep it from the public, according to our sources.

The Corps and Engineers and FEMA are quietly critical of the lack of support for quick action after the oil disaster by the Obama White House and the US Coast Guard. Only recently, has the Coast Guard understood the magnitude of the disaster, dispatching nearly 70 vessels to the affected area. WMR has also learned that inspections of off-shore rigs’ shut-off valves by the Minerals Management Service during the Bush administration were merely rubber-stamp operations, resulting from criminal collusion between Halliburton and the Interior Department’s service, and that the potential for similar disasters exists with the other 30,000 off-shore rigs that use the same shut-off valves.

The impact of the disaster became known to the Corps of Engineers and FEMA even before the White House began to take the magnitude of the impending catastrophe seriously. The first casualty of the disaster is the seafood industy, with not just fishermen, oystermen, crabbers, and shrimpers losing their jobs, but all those involved in the restaurant industry, from truckers to waitresses, facing lay-offs.

The invasion of crude oil into estuaries like the oyster-rich Apalachicola Bay in Florida spell disaster for the seafood industry. However, the biggest threat is to Florida’s Everglades, which federal and state experts fear will be turned into a “dead zone” if the oil continues to gush forth from the Gulf chasm. There are also expectations that the oil slick will be caught up in the Gulf stream off the eastern seaboard of the United States, fouling beaches and estuaries like the Chesapeake Bay, and ultimately target the rich fishing grounds of the Grand Banks off Newfoundland.

WMR has also learned that 36 urban areas on the Gulf of Mexico are expecting to be confronted with a major disaster from the oil volcano in the next few days. Although protective water surface boons are being laid to protect such sensitive areas as Alabama’s Dauphin Island, the mouth of the Mississippi River, and Florida’s Apalachicola Bay, Florida, there is only 16 miles of boons available for the protection of 2,276 miles of tidal shoreline in the state of Florida.

Emergency preparations in dealing with the expanding oil menace are now being made for cities and towns from Corpus Christi, Texas, to Houston, New Orleans, Gulfport, Mobile, Pensacola, Tampa-St.Petersburg-Clearwater, Sarasota-Bradenton, Naples, and Key West. Some 36 FEMA-funded contracts between cities, towns, and counties and emergency workers are due to be invoked within days, if not hours, according to WMR’s FEMA sources.

There are plans to evacuate people with respiratory problems, especially those among the retired senior population along the west coast of Florida, before officials begin burning surface oil as it begins to near the coastline.

There is another major threat looming for inland towns and cities. With hurricane season in effect, there is a potential for ocean oil to be picked up by hurricane-driven rains and dropped into fresh water lakes and rivers, far from the ocean, thus adding to the pollution of water supplies and eco-systems.

BP THINKING OF DRILLING ON ARCTIC:

BP's Endicott Island

As if it weren’t busy enough dealing with the greatest environmental disaster this country has ever seen, in the Gulf of Mexico, BP is planning to drill brand new ultra-extended-reach wells in the Arctic this year. What’s more, Secretary Ken Salazar’s Interior Department has done nothing to stop it.

In the hopes of drilling what would be the longest horizontal wells ever drilled, BP has built the most powerful drillship in the world and shipped it up to the Arctic for its latest project, which it dubs “Liberty.” Like the ultra-deepwater well in the Gulf that led to the catastrophe there, BP’s proposed Liberty project requires dangerous, untested technology that is far from foolproof. And as in the Gulf, the federal agency charged with overseeing oil activities has been too cozy with the oil companies in Alaska. In fact, it has recently come to light that the Interior Department allowed BP to write much of the environmental review for the Liberty project.

If something were to go wrong in the Arctic, BP simply could not deal with it. BP and the federal government have their hands completely tied trying to deal with the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. It would make absolutely no sense to allow the company to launch new, untested technology in the Arctic while it is still struggling to stop, contain and clean up the massive oil spill in the Gulf. A wide variety of species found nowhere but the Arctic make their home near BP’s Liberty project, including polar bears, which are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act because of the drastic loss of their sea-ice habitat. A Gulf-sized oil spill in the Arctic could spell disaster for struggling polar bears and other Arctic species.